Step 1
Unite with Fellow Investors
Step 2
Choose the Best Attorney
Step 3
Provide Documents
Step 4
Follow Case Progress
Step 5
Get Payout
SFIX.US
id: 220, Created by Stan Vick Chase, Scout
Stitch Fix
How it works?
- We find Attorney for the Case
- Attorney files case on behalf of Investors
- You get updates and receive payout in case of success
Would it cost me anything?
- No, you do not pay anything out of your pocket neither to us, nor to Attorney
- Attorneys get % fee in case of success
- Platform charges service fee from Attorneys
What are the chances for success?
Every Case is unique, but statistically, 47% of Cases end up with a settlement.
Please see below recent successful cases:
How it works?
- We find Attorney for the Case
- Attorney files case on behalf of Investors
- You get updates and receive payout in case of success
Would it cost me anything?
- No, you do not pay anything out of your pocket neither to us, nor to Attorney
- Attorneys get % fee in case of success
- Platform charges service fee from Attorneys
What are the chances for success?
Every Case is unique, but statistically, 47% of Cases end up with a settlement.
Please see below recent successful cases:
On March 8, 2022, Stitch Fix provided a weak outlook for its Q3 2022 and cut its revenue guidance for the full year. Also, Stitch Fix announced self-inflicted friction between the Freestyle program and the Fix program.
On this news, the price of Stitch Fix stock declined by 6%.
Back on December 8, 2020, Stitch Fix launched the “Freestyle” program (a new, direct buy program where customers could choose from the outset which items to purchase) to “expand our addressable market, deepen client engagement and grow wallet share over time.” The Company repeatedly denied claims that the Freestyle program could cannibalize its legacy Fix business.
On December 7, 2021, however, Stitch Fix admitted for the first time that the Company had downplayed the magnitude of its transition from the subscription-based Fix model to the retail-based Freestyle model. But the Company continued to assure investors that this was a short-term problem.
Taking into account all the statements of the Company and the actual results, there are grounds for suspicion that there was misinformation or negligence from the Company's management, which led to significant losses for investors.
Alleged Offence
Mismanagement,
Misleading Statements,
Financial Misrepresentation,
Failure to Disclose,
Malpractice,
Negligence,
Omissions
Suspected Party
Directors,
Management
Security Type
Stocks
Trade Direction
Long
Shock Event Date
08 March 2022
Court
Northern District of California