Step 1
Unite with Fellow Investors
Step 2
Choose the Best Attorney
Step 3
Provide Documents
Step 4
Follow Case Progress
Step 5
Get Payout
VBITTECH.FI
id: 584, Created by Stan Vick Chase, Scout
Join VBit Technologies Corp. Misleading Case to Fight Losses
How it works?
- We find Attorney for the Case
- Attorney files case on behalf of Investors
- You get updates and receive payout in case of success
Would it cost me anything?
- No, you do not pay anything out of your pocket neither to us, nor to Attorney
- Attorneys get % fee in case of success
- Platform charges service fee from Attorneys
What are the chances for success?
Every Case is unique, but statistically, 47% of Cases end up with a settlement.
Please see below recent successful cases:
How it works?
- We find Attorney for the Case
- Attorney files case on behalf of Investors
- You get updates and receive payout in case of success
Would it cost me anything?
- No, you do not pay anything out of your pocket neither to us, nor to Attorney
- Attorneys get % fee in case of success
- Platform charges service fee from Attorneys
What are the chances for success?
Every Case is unique, but statistically, 47% of Cases end up with a settlement.
Please see below recent successful cases:
- Investors were promised by VBit Technologies Corp individualized, specialized, cutting-edge computer technology touted by the Company as being capable of producing hefty returns.
- Investors never received from VBit Technologies Corp the individualized mining equipment and services that they paid for; rather, investments were pooled together with investments from other customers.
- The Bitcoins appearing in Investors' “virtual wallets” were mere investment returns arbitrarily determined by VBit Technologies Corp.
- Investors/Customers suspect the Company and its Leaders violated the Securities Act by offering, selling, and soliciting unregistered securities.
In June 2022, Investors discovered that they were unable to make withdrawals of Bitcoin from their “virtual wallets,” which were located in an online dashboard hosted by the Company.
- In reality, the Investors' individual wallets appeared to have been a façade as the Company was not offering and maintaining individualized, hardware-hosted mining services to Investors as represented.
- Instead, the Company was engaged in “cloud mining,” or a similar arrangement whereby customers’ computing power – dubbed a “hash rate” – is pooled together and wholly unrelated to the physical products and services they are purportedly being sold.
The Company’s activities have all the markings of a Ponzi scheme cloaked in technological sophistication. Moreover, the scheme has all the markings of a pyramid scheme as it was fueled with multi-level marketing, as customers were encouraged to recruit family, friends, and colleagues to become victims in exchange for purported rewards.
Alleged Offence
Mismanagement,
Misleading Statements,
Financial Misrepresentation,
Failure to Disclose,
Negligence,
Breach of Fiduciary duty,
Omissions
Suspected Party
Directors,
Management,
Service Provider
Security Type
Crypto Asset
Trade Direction
Long
Shock Event Date
13 February 2023
Case number
23-CV-00162
Filing date
13 February 2023
Lead Plaintiff Deadline
13 April 2023
Court
District of Delaware